06 January 2009
Echoes of Gaza: Reprisals in Europe
No surprise here, either. There's a fresh wave of attacks on European Jews in the wake of the invasion of Gaza. Some idiots may think this is all fair, as if striking a blow against any given Jewish person or property is an effective blow against Zionism. But it ought to be self-evident that Jews outside Israel are no more to be held physically accountable for Israeli atrocities as Muslims in America are for the deeds of al-Qaeda. If these incidents are someone's idea of fighting Zionism, then those someones are cheap cowards who don't want to go where the action is. That goes for anyone who thinks they're striking a blow for Gaza by doing something similar in the U.S. People of this sort might make a difference if they could actually assemble a -- dare I say it? -- crusade, forming an international army and placing themselves at the service of Hamas, Hezbollah, Fatah or the authority of their choice. Otherwise, they're just criminals.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
23 comments:
Anonymous1 says:
So Jews outside of Israel are not to be held accoubtable for what their cousins do in Gaza? Is that right Mr. Wilson? No shit. Just who finances what Jews do in Gaza? Who bullies the US government into supporting everything Israel does? Who sends billions of US tax dollars overseas at Jewish behest? Who lavishly finances a welter of pro-Zionist organizations with hundreds of millions of, if not billions, of contributions gathered from Jews all over the United States for decades? Who closes ranks with one voice to defend everything Israel does, no matter how criminal or odious? Who tries to destroy any politician or public figure who speaks out against all this, like President Jimmy Carter or Professors Walt and Mearsheimer?
Lawyers have concepts called accessory and accomplice, Mr. Wilson. They involve aiding and abetting the crimes of others. In what sense do you think that the Jews of America are not the accessories and accomplicies of the crimes of their cousins overseas? For over fifty years there was only one meaningful anti-Israeli organization in this land-the American Council For Judaism founded by Lessing Rosenwald. Its budget was miniscule and its influence over the policies of the pro-Zionist US government was zero. Now, there are a few more such anti-Zionist organizations but there influence is equally zero. No one listens to "Jews For Justice" or related such groups anymore than anyone listened to the American Council For Judaism for half a century. You and your side kick, Crime Think Collective, still cannot get it through your heads that Jews are not individuals but an internationally organized nation. You do not know the innumerable historical instances that prove this to be true-and,frankly,you are too stupid,ignorant and brainwashed to understand the facts when I point them out to you. I described to you long ago how the Jews from all points of the globe descended on the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 to demand "minority rights", a mandate over Palestine and a great League of Nations. I showed you how they wrote their own documents behind the scenes and then passed them off as proclamations of the British Empire. I showed you how Jews from all over the globe worked together, not as citizens of different countries but as members of an international blood brotherhood for common goals. And yet, you silly, stupid son-of-a-bitch, you still do not get it.
Your understanding of the situation in Gaza is equally childish. You stupidly think that the Israelis launched their invasion because of a few lousy rockets. How dumb are you? The Israelis planned this operation long ago for reasons that have nothing to do with rockets. That is the public pretense for political babes-in-diapers like you. It is exactly like the 1967 war-which idiots like you think was a case of the gallant Israelis "protecting themselves" from that wicked man closing the Straits of Tihran. In fact, the Zionists had been planning for a late '60's war for years-and merely used Gamal Abdel Nasser's ill-advised bluffing to provoke a war for entirely different reasons.
If you want to write intelligently about politics, you should first get a handle on some basic facts. You are write about one thing, however. The issue shall be solved by one side wiping out the other. When it happens, let us hope that the real evil, the Jewish international nation-in-dispersion, gets what it deserves. As for Mr. Wilson, maybe he could join the Abraham Lincoln Brigades of International Zionism and "loyally" serve those poor, persecuted Jews suffering from Warsaw Ghetto hangover.
You misunderstand my position. I've simply grown tired of the whining impotence of the anti-Zionist opposition. The Palestinians appear to be weak, corrupt and cowardly. You can argue that they've been reduced to that state by Zionist wickedness, but that just shows that one side is winning and the other isn't, repeating the process you claim to be consistent throughout human history. The Arabs can't get their act together, show little sign of wanting to, and probably never will. Meanwhile, cowards who would never dare risk facing a Zionist bullet delude themselves, with your endorsement, into thinking that they're striking effective blows in Gaza's defense by picking on people who might not necessarily give a rat's ass about Israel. You yourself will probably never do anything against your great enemy except rant anonymously, but it's you who should be joining some modern equivalent of the Lincoln Brigade and making your way to Palestine, since you feel so passionately about the subject, and you have plenty of time on your hands. How about it?
Anonymous1 says:
Actually, I understand you perfectly, Mr. Wilson. You think that conquest, oppression and lebensraum are bad when practiced by German Nazis but good when practiced by Jewish Nazis. Your preferences speak for themselves.
I note that my demolition of your ignorance on the non-culpability of Jews in America for Israeli crimes was nowhere addressed. You never do have anything to say on the facts, of which you know nothing. You claim to be tired of the wailing of Palestinians, who you accuse of not being able to "get their act together". (Just how they are supposed to do that when they have no power and are stomped on by the US and Israel is not explained.)Yet you are not tired of the wailing of niggers who "can't get their act together" and who wail about slavery eternally as the cause of all their problems. I think the complaints of the Palestinians are more justified than the complaints of the niggers, but we all have our preferences don't we, Mr. Wilson?
As for taking trips, why don't you take a trip to Africa and play Albert Schweitzer? Then you can see the noble savages in their natural state. You might even become a reformed Eldridge Cleaver, convinced of the genetic inferiority of his own people. In the meantime, I shall continue to elucidate the truth about one of the 20th centuries great injustices, while you eat the kind of bananas you prefer.
No, Anon, it's you who've said that conquest is the rule of the world but complain when the conquering is being done by people you dislike. I'm no rooter for the Israelis but I'm not going to grab a gun for Hamas either, as still seems to be what you ought to do, since you appear convinced that they deserve aid in their helplessness. You talk a good game of "elucidating" but it looks like you're all talk, no action, and scared of the Jews.
Anonymous1 says:
Mr. Wilson, do you live in Alice-in-Wonderland? It appears that you do. Do you really imagine that if I trot off to Palestine with a gun that that will change the situation? You pose as an advocate of justice for blacks but do not give a shit for justice for Arabs. You are just as selective as me.
Do I fear the retaliatory power of the Jews? You bet I do. They have financially ruined a great many people who have publicly opposed them. Or had you not noticed? Do you think a soldier should stick his head up so that a sniper may blow it off?
The American people will never demand an end to the abuses of the state of Israel until they know the facts. So long as they reason from slanted premises based on Zionist disinformation they will never see the light. If I can get one hundred people to understand what has really been going on over there and get them to do the same, I do more good than any sharpshooting in Gaza would ever do-even were I so inclined, which I am not.
Therefore, why do you not cease and desist with baseless criticism and learn to understand a certain subject. I have devoted many tens of thousands of hours in rare books getting an education on one of the most misunderstood subjects on earth. Would that you would do the same.
Ah, more racist diatribes from our favourite moron. I thought you were told to take your goose-stepping elsewhere, Adolph. Don't make me call your mama you dried up sack of leftover hate. No one in a civilized, modern society buys into your brand of compost. Did I say compost? I'm sorry, at least compost serves a useful purpose. All your racism serves is your pathetic need to justify your (lack) of a life and to channel your self-loathing towards undeserved targets. Now go follow in your führer's footsteps and put a bullet in your head.
So how many people have gained understanding from Anonymous 1's research? Does anyone care to share? Perhaps if he reaches his quota he will finally do his duty. Anyone who wishes violence on any particular group of people ought to have the courage to do it himself. Even if he convinces people, someone will still have to fight at some point. Perhaps he would set a more convincing example if he practiced what he preached, but he has declared himself a physical coward. Like many self-style great thinkers, he considers it his job to educate the people who will have to get shot to realize his vision. His brain-work apparently makes him too valuable to risk death. That puts him in the same category as George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden -- august company, indeed. They are equally capable of citing historical facts to "prove" their superstitions, as is any Zionist Anon cares to cite. But they are superstitions in every case.
Anonymous1 says:
Mr. Wilson could not distinguish between a superstition and a fact if his life depended upon it. He does not have the brains. His selective indignation about crusaders who want others to fight their wars is most amusing indeed. He cites George Bush, Jr. and Osama Bin Laden as examples. I note that he does not mention that polio crippled traitor in the White House, who chose not to go down with the fleet he set up at Pearl Harbor, nor does he mention all the great liberal intellectuals who cried; "No war, ever again!" after the blood bath of WW1-and who then screamed for war against Adolf Hitler, twenty years later. They did not do the fighting and dying, either. One wonders how the enlightened Mr. Wilson feels about the five cunt hole generals in the US military who want to send the male cannon fodder to their deaths while they, Julius Cunticus style, reap the glory.
Mr. Wilson, who slurps Israeli dick while pretending to be strictly impartial on the subject, ignores that it is the Israelis, not this author, who are inflicting in Gaza right now, the same carnage and terror that they inflicted in Lebanon in 1982, using the same transparent excuse of cleaning out "terrorist cells" that they are using now. Instead of worrying about what this author plans to do, maybe the born shit for brain, Sanuel Wison should worry about what the Israelis are doing right now. His moral compass is slightly skewered.
There is a great similarity between the dick head, Samuel Wilson, who snivels over Boy Scout rocket launchers fired into Israel, and the progressive thinkers of the 1930's who sniveled over broken panes of glass during Kristallnacht while applauding the tens of millions deaths of the Jewish gulags and the Ukrainian famine in the Soviet Union. I suspect that Mr. Wilson works in a university environment where he must observe the taboos to stay employed. Being independently wealthy, I do not have to practice circumsized fellatio as the price of my survival. Anyone can read Mr. Wilson's sliding, slippery evasions of real issues and discern exactly who he is blowing-and why.
I'll leave it to Crhymethinc to speculate on your sexual practices. I'll only say that it doesn't matter how many other people Anonymous 1 accuses of cowardice. None of it disproves that he, too, is a coward who longs to see Jews die but probably couldn't look one in the eye to even say what he believes, much less act on his desires. It's likewise, no doubt, with blacks, American Indians and all the other groups he fears.
Anonymous1 says:
Mr. Wilson says that Anonymous1 lacks the courage of his convictions-unlike America's Israel First Jews, who have the "courage" to send Americans to die in Iraq to fight Israel's war of Middle East imperium. Once again, Mr. Wilson remains silent about his own heroes who like to fight wars with other people's blood-while leveling idle criticisms against me based on his situational specific logic. Mr. Wilson is extremely, extremely stupid.
Just to belabor the point, Winston Churchill rejected Adolf Hitler's peace offers in 1940-1941 so that ordinary Brits could continue to die. Churchill, of course, stayed far behind the carnage. He ordered the aerial incineration of civilians while getting drunk at his 1-3AM war conferences. Obviously, Winnie-Pooh was one up on "cowardly" Anonymous1. This same Winston Churchill conspired with the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, to set up the Lusitania to take a hit from a German submarine in the deathly cold waters of the north Atlantic ocean. Naturally, neither Winnie nor Franklin could go down with the ship because their "superior minds" were indispensable to the further prosecution of the war.
Anonymous1 has not yet committed any such dastardly deeds. Since the brave Mr. Wilson believes that those who advocate killing should stand at the head of the legions on the battlefield, he should have the utmost respect for both Adolf Hitler and Joseph McCarthy who did see actual combat duty in two world wars-and who were both justifiably decorated for extreme bravery. I do not yet read Mr. Wilson making that argument-nor do I expect too.
Mr. Wilson is an intellectual punk. He cannot make obvious comparisons-but he can level accusations of cowardice which do not include his own intellectual cowardice. The next time I read of Congress declaring war (not that Congress any longer bothers with such formalities) I expect that Consul Samuel Fabius Wilson shall demand that Congress lead the next charge against Belleau Wood. It is only what he expects.
If at all possible, why not have an open debate somewhere, like in a dark alley, between Sammy and our anonymous "correspondent", and I use that term very loosely. Crackpots are like ostriches. When things get heated, they stick their heads in the sand, unable to accept the inaccuracy of their twisted doctrines.
Anonymous1 says:
To all my acid head fans and critics:
You may recall that when Adolf Hitler wanted to invade a country he always claimed that he was going to the rescue of Germans who were being persecuted. That is precisely the justification of every attack Israel launches in "self defense". The only difference is that factually, Hitler had a far better case.
At this moment Israel is using hideous phosphorus and cluster bombs to murder and maim by the thousands. (If you believe their press release casualty figures, you probably think they are using Civil War artillery.) Mr. Jew Fellatio Wilson piously proclaims Israel is doing this in "self defense". If you intellectual scumbags believe any of the nonsense you are writing, this country is irretrievably lost.The rest of the world is not so stupid.
Yes, and Adolph hated jews for the same bullshit reasoning you do. So that makes you, in some ways, just like the jews you hate. And I must agree with Mr. Wilson. You are nothing more than a coward. A loud mouth blowhard with too much retirement time. I have to wonder if you really are retired or merely living off the system on welfare. Either way, you're a despicable and deplorable ape. Not even worth calling a human being as you lack the facility to reason in a logical and consistent manner. As far as your sexual proclivities, other than mental masturbation, I highly doubt you have sexual proclivities. In fact, I'm pretty sure you're incapable of any sexual activity whatsoever. Other than to fantasize about being teabagged by our president-elect.
Anonymous1 says:
I have more brains in my little finger than he has in his entire head.
You keep insisting you have some amount of intelligence and yet we've seen no proof. The only facts you have given are that you are a bigot, a racist, and a white supremacist, none of which speaks of any true intelligence. Your jibes are, at best, at a sophomoric level. In fact, I've been called worse by a far better class of people. Your wit lacks edge. In other words, you're sword fighting with a spoon. Maybe your white hood is too tight and is cutting off the circulation to your brain. Or maybe you're just an infantile old man pissed off because there's no one left to change your depends.
Hitler is entitled to credit for fighting in the Great War, I suppose, though my analogy would require Kaiser Wilhelm to fight alongside him. Nevertheless, while Adolf got closer to the front lines than most of his peers when he was a leader,he didn't exactly lead any of the suicidal counter-attacks he ordered from his troops. Being a leader of men apparently confers certain privileges and exemptions, as Anonymous 1 no doubt feels as a would-be fuehrer, jarl, kleagle or whatever title he might confer upon himself. Joe McCarthy's WW2 record has been questioned by some writers, but I don't claim to know the full truth. Nevertheless, the appropriate analogy in this case would be to note that the 43 year old Senator did not resign his Senate seat and re-enlist when the chance came to fight Commies in Korea. What's good for the modern Congress (and I don't object to Anon's point here) was good for his hero "Tail Gunner Joe" as well. Which brings us finally back to Anonymous 1 himself, who still hasn't answered the question currently on the floor about his essential cowardice. He carries on his forlorn hope that from the safety of the internet he can convince other people to fight his battles for him. But in the miraculous event that someone ever acted on his recommendations, I'm sure he'd immediately deny the same accountabilty that he demands from random Jewish people. If I'm right about this, then he is doubly a coward. My indifference to his growing mound of vulgarity is understandable.
Anonymous1 says:
"By my words ye shall know me." Try reading them, stupid.
They look like the words of a coward to me.
How about quoting your source material, Anon? How about debating Sammy out in the open? We'll bring the Pepto.
Anonymous1 says:
I shall ignore both Mr. Wilson and Crime Collective, who like to talk their way around real historical issues by accusing me of a completely irrelevant charge of cowardice. Instead I shall respond to Hobbyfan, who appears to be a latecomer to these threads. Which sources on which subjects?
If Hobbyfan is looking for the real history of Arab Palestine hidden behind Zionist propaganda, I reccomend Dr. Robert John's history "The Palestine Diaries" in two volumes with introduction by Arnold J. Toynbee. If he wants a short history of Zionism, he can read my The Fraud of Zionism" essay on Radio Islam website. If he wants the history of real terrorism, he can consult J. Bowyer Bell's excellent study "Terror Out Of Zion". (Incidentally, since Wilson thinks that doing your own killing for the sake of your ideals is commendable procedure, no doubt he adores Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, Geula Cohen, Dov Gruner and all those other Jew boys and Jew girls who killed so many to create their Jewish Frankenstein's monster in Arab Palestine. Naturally, punk Wilson does not think so logically.)
If Hobbyfan is serious (I doubt it), he can always get the works of the Israeli revisionist historians like Benny Morris, Ilan Pappe and others and find out what really happened in 1948. As for coming out in the open, does not Mr. Wilson himself hide behind a pseudonym on the grounds that'what I think is more important than who I am"?
"By my words, ye shall know me". That, I believe, is from the Bible. I'll have to look up the appropriate book, chapter, & verse, unless Anon can do that for us.
I have to agree with Anon about "out in the open." I've never questioned his prerogative of anonymity, since that would be hypocritical of me. If it's good enough for Publius, it's good enough for us. Now:"doing your own killing for the sake of your ideas" is commendable, relatively speaking, compared to speculatively cheerleading for others to kill your enemies. The objective merits of the ideas and the killing depend on other considerations.
Anonymous1 says:
Nothing further to say, boys?
Post a Comment