04 December 2008

Canadians: To the Airports?

Of all places, Canada is now embroiled in a constitutional crisis. A beleaguered conservative prime minister, facing an imminent no-confidence vote, appealed to the nation's governor-general, a representative of the country's head of state -- Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain -- and secured permission to prorogue Parliament until January 26, 2009. He justified the action by his need to formulate an economic plan without partisan interference and his aversion to a parliamentary coalition against him that included the Bloc Quebecois, which he characterizes as a separatist movement and therefore an irresponsible partner in any government. No Canadian prime minister has ever evaded a no-confidence vote by shutting down Parliament before. It's unclear to me whether this means that Mr. Harper can rule by decree for the next few weeks, but it ought to be a scandal to anyone who believes in representative government. Harper has declared himself irreplaceable, at least temporarily, and in defiance of a presumptive parliamentary majority that represents a majority of the Canadian people. So what are the Canadians going to do about it? This guy seems like a more self-evident threat to democracy than the poor slob that just got sacked in Thailand. For that matter, how many Canadians ever thought that, during the 21st century, a representative of Great Britain has pre-empted Canadian self-government? If a bunch of Thais who don't really believe in democracy can work up some people power to get their point across, even if it proved to be superfluous, what are Canadians capable of? I'll be interested in finding out.


ng2000 said...

Valuable resource of canadian parliament news summaries: http://www.ng2000.com/blog/2008/12/05/canadian-parliament/

Vancouver realtor said...

To the airports - to do what? To force Harper to step-down? Who would be the prime minister? Dion? His party suffered extensive loss of confidence in the last election - so he has the right to be the PM? Not to say about the fragile "unity" of this coalition trinity.
Canada has been in political crisis for some years now - four elections in eight years, now maybe another one - that's crisis.
Take care

Samuel Wilson said...

But if Harper hasn't the confidence of Parliament, what right has he to block the normal course of events? If this is to be an accepted rule of conduct, what's the point of having confidence votes? You can damn the opposition, and I'm in no position to defend them, but Harper seems to be trying to exempt himself from normal accountability. If he feels that way about it, let him call a convention to adopt an American-style constitution and do away with the parliamentary system, and then let him run for President. Until then, his action can't help but look like suspicious if not dangerous. Thanks anyway for contributing a Canadian perspective on the situation.