tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8820814198873126054.post2921980788848976019..comments2023-10-20T05:51:51.625-04:00Comments on The THINK 3 INSTITUTE: Van Hollen v. FEC and the secret ballot for campaign donorsSamuel Wilsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00934870299522899944noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8820814198873126054.post-51349718403797003052012-05-21T11:40:47.434-04:002012-05-21T11:40:47.434-04:00Would you accept the other side of the coin and af...Would you accept the other side of the coin and affirm that we have a right to know whom everyone votes for? If one group of people sees material losses from an election -- it could be either workers or bosses, depending on who won -- should they be able to hold voters accountable? Or can you justify a distinction between publicizing donations and publicizing votes?Samuel Wilsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00934870299522899944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8820814198873126054.post-53775517980308794882012-05-21T06:56:34.484-04:002012-05-21T06:56:34.484-04:00I disagree. Since this country has for decades be...I disagree. Since this country has for decades been railroaded into mass consumerism and exists only because of consumers spending their money; and considering the political climate, if corporations have a right to "buy" government through political donations, the consumers that support the corporations should have the right to know which policies corporations support through those donations and, if they disagree with those policies, effect the donations by boycotting the corporations, lowering the amount of money they have for bribes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com